Efficacy and safety of sarilumab in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019: a randomized clinical trial

S Sivapalasingam, DJ Lederer, R Bhore… - Clinical Infectious …, 2022 - academic.oup.com
S Sivapalasingam, DJ Lederer, R Bhore, N Hajizadeh, G Criner, R Hosain, A Mahmood…
Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2022academic.oup.com
Background Open-label platform trials and a prospective meta-analysis suggest efficacy of
anti–interleukin (IL)-6R therapies in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019
(COVID-19) receiving corticosteroids. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of
sarilumab, an anti–IL-6R monoclonal antibody, in the treatment of hospitalized patients with
COVID-19. Methods In this adaptive, phase 2/3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-
controlled trial, adults hospitalized with COVID-19 received intravenous sarilumab 400 mg …
Background
Open-label platform trials and a prospective meta-analysis suggest efficacy of anti–interleukin (IL)-6R therapies in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) receiving corticosteroids. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of sarilumab, an anti–IL-6R monoclonal antibody, in the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19.
Methods
In this adaptive, phase 2/3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adults hospitalized with COVID-19 received intravenous sarilumab 400 mg or placebo. The phase 3 primary analysis population included patients with critical COVID-19 receiving mechanical ventilation (MV). The primary outcome was proportion of patients with ≥1-point improvement in clinical status from baseline to day 22.
Results
There were 457 and 1365 patients randomized and treated in phases 2 and 3, respectively. In phase 3, patients with critical COVID-19 receiving MV (n = 298; 28.2% on corticosteroids), the proportion with ≥1-point improvement in clinical status (alive, not receiving MV) at day 22 was 43.2% for sarilumab and 35.5% for placebo (risk difference, +7.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], –7.4 to 21.3; P =.3261), a relative risk improvement of 21.7%. In post hoc analyses pooling phase 2 and 3 critical patients receiving MV, the hazard ratio for death for sarilumab vs placebo was 0.76 (95% CI, .51 to 1.13) overall and 0.49 (95% CI, .25 to .94) in patients receiving corticosteroids at baseline.
Conclusions
This study did not establish the efficacy of sarilumab in hospitalized patients with severe/critical COVID-19. Post hoc analyses were consistent with other studies that found a benefit of sarilumab in patients receiving corticosteroids.
Clinical Trials Registration
NCT04315298.
Oxford University Press