Anti‐fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

DA Henry, PA Carless, AJ Moxey… - Cochrane database …, 2011 - cochranelibrary.com
DA Henry, PA Carless, AJ Moxey, D O'Connell, BJ Stokes, DA Fergusson, K Ker
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011cochranelibrary.com
Background Concerns regarding the safety of transfused blood have led to the development
of a range of interventions to minimise blood loss during major surgery. Anti‐fibrinolytic
drugs are widely used, particularly in cardiac surgery, and previous reviews have found
them to be effective in reducing blood loss, the need for transfusion, and the need for re‐
operation due to continued or recurrent bleeding. In the last few years questions have been
raised regarding the comparative performance of the drugs. The safety of the most popular …
Background
Concerns regarding the safety of transfused blood have led to the development of a range of interventions to minimise blood loss during major surgery. Anti‐fibrinolytic drugs are widely used, particularly in cardiac surgery, and previous reviews have found them to be effective in reducing blood loss, the need for transfusion, and the need for re‐operation due to continued or recurrent bleeding. In the last few years questions have been raised regarding the comparative performance of the drugs. The safety of the most popular agent, aprotinin, has been challenged, and it was withdrawn from world markets in May 2008 because of concerns that it increased the risk of cardiovascular complications and death.
Objectives
To assess the comparative effects of the anti‐fibrinolytic drugs aprotinin, tranexamic acid (TXA), and epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) on blood loss during surgery, the need for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, and adverse events, particularly vascular occlusion, renal dysfunction, and death.
cochranelibrary.com