Regulation of the somatotropic axis by intensive insulin therapy during protracted critical illness

D Mesotten, PJ Wouters, RP Peeters… - The Journal of …, 2004 - academic.oup.com
D Mesotten, PJ Wouters, RP Peeters, KV Hardman, JM Holly, RC Baxter, G Van den Berghe
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2004academic.oup.com
The catabolic state of critical illness has been linked to the suppressed somatotropic GH-IGF-
binding protein (IGFBP) axis. In critically ill patients it has been demonstrated that, compared
with the conventional approach, which only recommended insulin therapy when blood
glucose levels exceeded 12 mmol/liter, strict maintenance of blood glucose levels below 6.1
mmol/liter with intensive insulin therapy almost halved intensive care mortality, acute renal
failure, critical illness polyneuropathy, and bloodstream infections. Poor blood glucose …
Abstract
The catabolic state of critical illness has been linked to the suppressed somatotropic GH-IGF-binding protein (IGFBP) axis. In critically ill patients it has been demonstrated that, compared with the conventional approach, which only recommended insulin therapy when blood glucose levels exceeded 12 mmol/liter, strict maintenance of blood glucose levels below 6.1 mmol/liter with intensive insulin therapy almost halved intensive care mortality, acute renal failure, critical illness polyneuropathy, and bloodstream infections. Poor blood glucose control in diabetes mellitus has also been associated with low serum IGF-I levels, which can be increased by insulin therapy. We hypothesized that intensive insulin therapy would improve the IGF-I axis, possibly contributing to the clinical correlates of anabolism. Therefore, this study of 363 patients, requiring intensive care for more than 7 d and randomly assigned to either conventional or intensive insulin therapy, examines the effects of intensive insulin therapy on the somatotropic axis. Contrary to expectation, intensive insulin therapy suppressed serum IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and acid-labile subunit concentrations. This effect was independent of survival of the critically ill patient. Concomitantly, serum GH levels were increased by intensive insulin therapy. The suppression of IGF-I in association with the increased GH levels suggests GH resistance induced by intensive insulin therapy, which was reflected by the decreased serum GH-binding protein levels. Intensive insulin therapy did not affect IGFBP-3 proteolysis, which was markedly higher in protracted critically ill patients compared with healthy controls. Also, intensive insulin therapy did not suppress the urea/creatinine ratio, a clinical correlate of catabolism. In conclusion, our data suggest that intensive insulin therapy surprisingly suppressed the somatotropic axis despite its beneficial effects on patient outcome. GH resistance accompanied this suppression of the IGF-I axis. To what extent and through which mechanisms the changes in the GH-IGF-IGFBP axis contributed to the survival benefit under intensive insulin therapy remain elusive.
Oxford University Press